Following is an exchange of Usenet messages on the can.taxes newsgroup between Eldon Warman and myself, in which Warman not only states that his detax program is based on "legal definitions obrtained [sic] from judicially accepted law dictionaries", but also demonstrates his propensity to dishonestly quote what others have posted.

The first message is from myself to Warman:

From: fredg@his.com (Fred Grosby)
Newsgroups: can.taxes
Subject: Re: Freaky Freddie says...
Message-ID: <3b1471fa.46849425@news.telus.net>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 04:15:45 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 22:15:45 MDT

On Wed, 30 May 2001 03:47:09 GMT, DetaxCanada <nospam@newsranger.com> wrote:

[Eldon Warman's lies and forgeries deleted]

Such a coward you are, Eldon! Only a coward forges and lies as do you. And your lame tactic of changing subject lines won't work, either. We're not gullible and weak-minded.

If you've got the guts, the courage, the *spine*, if you will, answer the question:

"This stuff doesn't work, Ron, and y'all who bear the burden of proof that it does provide absolutely no evidence to that effect. So why, exactly, should we believe you?"

Why, exactly, should we believe you, Eldon?

---
Fred Grosby
fredg@his.com
www.his.com/~fandl/fred.html
---
Learn the truth about Eldon Warman and Detax Canada at
http://ca.geocities.com/eldon_warman_sucks/index.html

Eldon Warman replies:

Newsgroups: can.taxes
From: DetaxCanada <nospam@newsranger.com>
Subject: Re: Freaky Freddie says...
Message-ID: <ZgeR6.6104$rn5.294733@www.newsranger.com>
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 18:14:17 EDT
Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 22:14:17 GMT

>Frantic Freddie, the Damage Control Goon says...
>
>On Wed, 30 May 2001 03:47:09 GMT, DetaxCanada <nospam@newsranger.com> wrote:
>
>[Eldon Warman's exposures to our deceit and lies deleted]
>
>Such an unusually brave man you are, Eldon! Only a coward
>like me forges and lies. And your thoughtful tactic of
>changing subject lines works very well in exposing my
>traitorous ass.
>We're gullible and weak-minded.
>
>I'm sure you've got the guts, the courage, the *spine* and the
>will to answer the question:
>
>"This stuff works extremely well, Ron, and y'all who bear the
>burden of proof that it does provide sufficient evidence to
>that effect.
>So why, exactly, shouldn't we believe you?"
>
>Why, exactly, shouldn't we believe you, Eldon?
>
>---
>Fred Grosby
>fredg@his.com
>www.his.com/~fandl/fred.html
>---
>Learn how we "damage control goons", like myself and David
>Lethbridge post liable and slander against Eldon Warman and
>Detax Canada at
>http://ca.geocities.com/eldon_warman_sucks/index.html

My answer: I really don't know why? My detax program is totally within simple contract law and from legal definitions obrtained from judicially accepted law dictionaries.

Eldon Warman
http://www.detaxcanada.org

Note the last sentence of Warman's reply, which is what prompted me to construct the "Eldon Warman's Definition of 'Person' Unmasked" web page. Also, if you compare what I actually wrote with what Warman claims I wrote, you will see that Warman dishonestly quoted what I originally posted.

Back to Eldon Warman's Definition of "Person" Unmasked

Back to Eldon Warman's Dishonest Quoting of Newsgroup Messages Unmasked